A quick search for photos on the internet reveals the
differences between having a clean air act and not. In the US,
we have had a Clean Air Act since 1970.
Corporate interests may complain,
but this is the result on a worst case day in New York City:
And a worst case day in Los Angeles:
Compare that to a worst case day in Beijing, China,
where there is nothing like our clean air act:
And this is what it looks like in Beijing on a “not too bad”
day:
Pollution kills people,
that we already know to be factual.
There are no “alternative facts” to this. There is no such thing as an “alternative
fact”. There are political lies, however.
A lot of them.
Dismantling the EPA to “reduce the regulatory burden” on
giant corporations is very bad public policy. Muzzling the outreach of civil servants at
the EPA to cover up the dismantling of the agency is even more evil! That is the very worst-conceivable form of
censorship! It is the form that kills
people.
That is not to say the EPA does not need reform, because it most certainly does! They would not need to outsource their scientific
work to academia, if there were more
scientists than lawyers on the EPA staff. And they really do have more lawyers than
scientists, for that outsourcing of the
science was also frozen, as was their outreach
to the public on social media. (And that
of the national park staffs.)
But on balance, not
killing people with pollution is more important. The Trump administration attack on the EPA is
an evil that will kill Americans.
No comments:
Post a Comment