The picture came from a news article published in the AAAS’s journal “Science”, specifically the 9 December 2022 issue, designated volume 678 issue 6624, on page 1036. The news article was titled “Hero City”, and was about Kharkiv, Ukraine, being a former science center wanting to recover. I literally photographed the page in the journal magazine.
The picture shows what appears to be a bombardment missile
that was apparently a dud, embedded in
the pavement near the Neutron Source Facility,
at the Kharkiv Institute of Science and Technology. The missile would appear to be a
tube-launched device with fold-out wrap-around fins. There would appear to be six
of these fins, each hinged three places to
flip out, all flipping-out in the same
direction.
The flip-out hinge line is canted with respect to the body
axis, as can be so very clearly seen
with the fin more-or-less pointing toward the viewer, in the center of the visible fin pattern. All the fins cant the same way, creating lift forces that sum up, directed tangential to the missile body
surface.
Thus, this
is a spin-stabilized weapon, which
means in turn that it is otherwise unguided! That kind of thing is not “targeted” at
all, it is a random area-destruction
weapon, typically launched en masse as
an indiscriminate bombardment means. I
spent 20 years in aerospace defense engineering work, so I really do know what I am talking about
here.
“Unguided” makes a lie out of Russian claims
they are carefully targeting their strikes in Ukraine!
They also swore they were not going to invade, right up to the day before they invaded. And a bunch of other lies revealed
publicly.
The real takeaway here is that you cannot believe
anything the Russians say: not
then, not now, and not in the future. And that includes any possible “peace
negotiations”.
It seems apparent to me that the louder the Russian saber-rattling, the closer they actually are to losing that
war! So,
why should Ukraine negotiate, when they are actually winning? Because of catastrophic damage to their
infrastructure? All that means is
that our help is not yet enough.
But, the Russians
also claimed they will not use nuclear weapons in Ukraine (despite their longstanding
doctrine that they would do so in an attempt to avoid defeat on the battlefield).
So be prepared for when (not “if”, “when”)
they do “go nuclear”! The closer they
get to defeat, the more likely it
becomes that they will use tactical nuclear weapons on Ukrainian cities!
If Russia loses,
Putin’s regime falls, and he and all
his cronies know it! A Russia without
Putin could be a friend. Which is the
best possible argument for doing everything we can to ensure Ukrainian victory.
References (which I wrote earlier on this topic):
#1. “How To Stop the Ukraine War”, posted 27 November 2022
#2. “Nuclear War Warning”, posted 12 September 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment