Interesting phrases, and the debunking of an internet myth with the even stranger truth. This is not an April Fool’s joke!
Where did
the standard railroad gauge (spacing between rail heads) come from?
As for standard railroad
track gauge, you have to understand where that came from. 4 ft 8.5
inches = 1.435 m between rail heads is not a nice round number in anybody's
measuring-units system.
The first rail carriages were made in Europe from road wagons, the wheels of which fitted the worn ruts in the roads, with that road rut spacing. The roads were rutted to the same width all over Europe. One has to wonder why?
That rut spacing matched exactly the rut spacing in the old Roman roads made of stone. Ruts worn there by the passage of Roman iron-rimmed chariot wheels. And the Romans ruled most of Europe for a long time. That's why.
Roman chariot wheels were spaced just far enough apart that the two horses that drew them, would not trip and stumble in those ruts. That rut spacing was quite literally set by (the width of) two horse's asses!
Which just goes to show that the evil/stupidity that men do lives long after them.
Where did
the saying “son of a gun” come from?
This is about
3 or 4 centuries old, coming from the
voyages of colonization from Europe to the “new World” and Australia. In those days, ships were much slower, and even crossing the Atlantic took multiple
months.
Conditions
aboard these ships were rather squalid,
and with not much to do, many of
the women turned up pregnant. Under such
conditions, many of them would not say
who the father was.
Medicine
being what it was during those centuries (about 1 step removed from being witch
doctors), about 10% or more of these
women would die in childbirth, and a lot
more than that would be having very serious troubles giving birth.
As a last
resort, the ship’s doctor would have the
woman dragged up to the gun deck and placed between two of the ship’s
guns. They would fire one, in an effort to scare the baby out of her.
If it
worked, the baby was known as a son of a
gun.
Where did
the saying “cold enough to freeze the balls off a brass monkey” come from?
Despite the
image this conjures up, the saying has
nothing to do with monkeys or genitalia.
It comes from the days of wind driven ships and smooth-bore
cannons, around 2-3 centuries ago. In those days, iron was expensive and brass was cheap, unlike today.
Cannon balls
had to be made of expensive iron, but being
spheres, rolled all over pitching
decks. They had to be restrained from
that. The solution was a triangular
frame resembling the rack that positions billiard balls today, into which the cannon balls could be stacked
in a stable 3-sided pyramidal shape.
Naval
terminology being unlike language anywhere else on Earth, this rack was called a “monkey”, and it was made of inexpensive brass. That’s where the term “brass monkey” derives. But there’s more …
About 2
centuries ago, when these old sailing
ships ventured into the Arctic and the Antarctic, they encountered colder temperatures than
anybody in the home countries had ever experienced before. Brass has a larger coefficient of thermal
expansion than cast iron, so the “monkey”
(rack) shrank in the cold faster than the cannon balls did.
Cold
enough, and the shrinking rack would
squeeze the stack of cannon balls too hard,
causing some of them to suddenly pop loose from the stack, and go rolling around on the deck. Such cold weather was deemed literally “cold
enough to freeze the balls off the brass monkey”.
Where did
the phrase “the whole nine yards” come from?
During World
War 1, the British Royal Flying Corps
installed a type of belt-fed machine gun on some of its biplane fighter
planes. This particular gun design used
an ammunition belt that was 27 feet (9 yards) long. Returning pilots who had used up all their
ammunition had literally shot “the whole nine yards”.
Which
rocket was really designed by the size of a railway tunnel?
Contrary to
claims often made on the internet and social media, the rocket designed by the size of railway
tunnels was not the Space Shuttle solid boosters, it was Werner Von Braun’s V-2 missile in
Germany during World War 2.
The
Association of American Railroads (AAR) has a specification for the dimensions
of rail cars that will fit through any bridges,
tunnels , and around mountainside
curves, meant for standard gauge track. The details of this are given in AAR Plate B
“equipment clearance diagram” in detail,
but suffice it to say here that the max overall width is 10 feet 8
inches, and the max height above the
rail heads is 15 feet 1 inch.
The Space
Shuttle booster rocket segments were 120 inch (10 feet) outside diameter. They would fit as segments just fine, shipped on a railroad flat car, through any tunnels, bridges,
or mountainous curves, anywhere
in the US. That was not the rocket
“sized to fit railway tunnels”! It was
sized by other design considerations,
including then-available propellant mix and cast capabilities, at what was once Thiokol in Salt Lake
City, Utah.
The V-2 was
manufactured at a facility known as the “Mittlewerk”, using concentration camp slave labor, in the mountains of Bavaria in southern
Germany, during World War 2. In Germany at that time, although the same gauge track as in the
US, railway tunnel clearances were
tighter than AAR Plate B, and the entire
weapon had to fit upon a standard German flat car of that time (as well as a
roadable trailer), and go through
railway tunnels in the Bavarian mountains.
That fit
through a tunnel on a railroad flat car is why the V-2 was limited to 45 feet 11
inches long, and had the
odd-shaped, short-span, long-chord fins that it had. It rode in the X-configuration on those flat
cars. Body diameter was 5 feet 5
inch, and the wingspan of the fins
tip-to-tip was 11 feet 8 inches. In the
X-configuration, those fins fit within a
square box 8 feet 3 inches on a side.
Source: Wikipedia,
“V-2 Rocket”, as of 3-31-2024
I've read the balls off a brass monkey story before. I'm very skeptical. I looked up the CTE of brass and iron on this site:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/linear-expansion-coefficients-d_95.html
If I didn't screw up, the difference between cast iron and brass is about 4 X 10^-6. So, if you had a monkey 5 feet wide, and a temperature drop of 100 degrees F, the difference might be about 0.024". I have a hard time believing that cannonballs, and especially brass monkeys, were even fabricated with tolerances that tight. Furthermore, the cannonballs would have to be raised a significant distance if the monkey fit perfectly at a normal temperature, before the ball would roll off. I hope you can show me where I'm' wrong about this, because it's a good story. Maybe it would work with an EVA monkey. After long enough, maybe no one would notice how historically implausible that would be. Alternatively, a sea of liquid nitrogen navigated by ships meant for water. ;-)
I got a somewhat similar number myself, using equal baseline lengths for the brass and cast iron. I think the monkey height was far less than the cannonball radius, though. For those monkeys at the low end of the tolerance, and also tight-fitted with cannon balls, I can see the monkey force prying up a ball or two, causing the stack to lose a ball or two off the top. -- GW
ReplyDelete