The figure indicates what is happening for a coasting body at higher hypersonic speeds. If propelled, the propulsion stream replaces some or all of the recirculating wake zone. For purposes here, “high hypersonic” is roughly Mach 8 or more.
The bow shock is close to the body surface (that is the
definition of “hypersonic”). Between it
and the body there is shocked air, and
there is a sort of boundary layer sheath affected by friction, that wets the body. Because of friction dissipation effects, this boundary layer is hot enough to show some
ionization, even at lower hypersonic
speeds (about Mach 6 or 7). The shocked
air just outside it will eventually also show ionization, but only at much higher speeds.
The faster the speed,
the more ionization there is. The
more ionization there is, the brighter
the plasma sheath glows, and eventually
also the shocked air. The brighter the
plasma glows, the more opaque the plasma
sheath is to radio, radar, infrared,
and visible light. That greatly affects
what on-board guidance approaches will be feasible, as well as communications to and from the
body, and also the visibility of the
body and its flow field to sensors on the ground.
Inertial guidance of high quality can take your hypersonic
missile to a fixed target quite accurately,
as long as the flight time does not exceed about a quarter hour. But hitting a moving target will be a severe
problem, especially if it is
fast-moving. The missile would have to
slow down enough to dissipate the plasma sheath, in order to use radar, optical,
or infrared guidance to find its target.
The same would be true for radio command guidance, from the launch (or some other) site.
Radar on the ground will not see the body itself, but it will see the plasma sheath and the wake
flows, as these are electrically conductive, rather like a metal. Because they glow from incandescence, they emit light and heat (infrared). This shows up as a glowing streak across the
sky, of some length corresponding to how
quickly mixing and energy emission cool the plasma back to
non-incandescence. The glowing streak persists
for minutes at entry altitudes, only seconds
much lower down. At Mach 6 to 7, with
only about 1 second persistence, the
glowing streak is still about 2 km long!
Radar is not like human vision: it sees only the relative brightness among
discrete pixels that represent its field of view, with a timed range that is accurate
regardless. If the radar system is
capable of being programmed to track the leading tip of the moving bright
streak across the sky, then effectively
it is tracking the body. If not, then it cannot accurately track the body. A similar thing applies to reticle-type
infrared tracking. Visible or infrared
imaging will see the leading tip of the streak more-or-less the same way the human
eye does: quite effectively.
The plasma sheath is turbulent, and moving at rather high speeds relative to
the body surface. Between that relative
motion and that turbulence, plus the
obscuration of the body itself, a
doppler radar will inherently obtain the wrong speed for the body, if it can sort anything at all out of a very confused
signal. So if the target tracking is
based on a doppler-derived velocity, it
will sooner or later lose track, by grossly
mis-predicting the next location.
But with the right signal processing algorithms in the radar
system, looking at the motion of the
leading tip of the streak instead of doppler,
the glowing plasma sheath is NOT a “cloak of invisibility”, as is often claimed!
To imaging systems (optical or infrared) that “see” the way
the eye does, there is no “invisibility”
at all, quite the opposite, actually!
No comments:
Post a Comment